Betekenis van:
serve up

to serve up
Werkwoord
  • scheppen
  • provide (usually but not necessarily food)

Synoniemen

Hyperoniemen

Hyponiemen

to serve up
Werkwoord
  • opdienen
  • provide (usually but not necessarily food)

Synoniemen

Hyperoniemen

Hyponiemen

to serve up
Werkwoord
  • (het eten) op tafel brengen
  • provide (usually but not necessarily food)

Synoniemen

Hyperoniemen

Hyponiemen

to serve up
Werkwoord
  • uitserveren
  • provide (usually but not necessarily food)

Synoniemen

Hyperoniemen

Hyponiemen

to serve up
Werkwoord
  • misdienen
  • provide (usually but not necessarily food)

Synoniemen

Hyperoniemen

Hyponiemen

Werkwoord


Voorbeeldzinnen

  1. First of all, SBE Swiss BioEnergy AG and Sauter Verpachtung serve as general contractors for setting up bioethanol and biodiesel plants operated by entities held by the family.
  2. The Authority notes that the project intends to secure Internet connectivity to Iceland by having a reliable transmission method to which the former CANTAT-3 connection will serve as a back-up.
  3. A national Sirene bureau shall be set up by each of the Member States to serve as a single contact point for the Member States applying the Schengen Convention.
  4. The statement drawn up in accordance with paragraph 1 shall serve as the invoice which the principal, where he is a taxable person, must issue to the organiser of the sale by public auction in accordance with Article 220.
  5. In its opinion on clusters and cluster policy adopted on 19 June 2008, the Committee of the Regions calls for the setting-up of a High Level Expert Group on Clusters, which could serve as a platform for discussing the implementation of a general strategic framework for clusters.
  6. A member of the temporary staff who is called up for military service, alternative services or reserve training or who is recalled to serve in the armed forces shall be assigned leave for national service; such leave may in no circumstances exceed the duration of the contract.
  7. Where knitted or crocheted textile fabrics serve only as reinforcement, gloves, mittens or mitts impregnated, coated or covered with cellular plastics or cellular rubber belong in Chapter 39 or 40, even if they are made up from unimpregnated, uncoated or uncovered knitted or crocheted textile fabrics and subsequently impregnated, coated or covered with cellular plastics or cellular rubber (note 2(a)(5) and note 4, last paragraph, to Chapter 59).
  8. In this connection, the Commission suggested that the legal minimum capital requirements could serve as a guide for assessing the appropriateness of the compensatory measures since a bank that was undercapitalised would have to reduce its activities accordingly (undercapitalisation of EUR 1 billion with a legal minimum capital ratio of 4 % would require a theoretical reduction of risk‐adjusted assets of up to EUR 25 billion).
  9. Where textile fabrics (other than knitted or crocheted) serve only as reinforcement, gloves, mittens or mitts impregnated, coated or covered with cellular plastics or cellular rubber belong in Chapter 39 or 40, even if they are made up from unimpregnated, uncoated or uncovered textile fabrics (other than knitted or crocheted) and subsequently impregnated, coated or covered with cellular plastics or cellular rubber (note 2(a)(5) and note 4, last paragraph, to Chapter 59).
  10. The Commission has already made clear in its Decision 2000/392/EC that a comparison between WfA's assets, which were also recognised as core capital, and hybrid equity instruments that were regarded only as additional capital, such as profit participation certificates and non-voting preference shares, cannot serve as a basis for determining the appropriate remuneration for the transferred capital. Core capital is of greater benefit to an undertaking because it can be used to raise additional own funds (e.g. profit participation certificates) up to the same amount in order to increase its own funds base.
  11. The analysis conducted in the light of Article 87(3)(c) has identified two potential market failures specific to the digital switch-over of the terrestrial broadcasting platform: coordination problems between the different market players in achieving a smooth switch-over process and positive externalities associated with the freeing-up of frequency spectrum. While these market failures may, in principle, justify a departure from the principle of technological neutrality, they cannot serve as justification for the aid granted in the present case. Accordingly, the Commission is not convinced that the aid is an appropriate, necessary and proportionate instrument to remedy a market failure and to promote the roll-out of DVB-T. Even if account is taken of the fact that the amount of aid is relatively low in absolute terms and that the distortion of competition at broadcasting level is rather limited, the aid amounts, in case of some channels, to close to half of the transmission costs and may have influenced the choice of broadcasters in favour of the DVB-T platform, thereby causing a more important distortion of competition at network level.